Levels Not Rates

As I suspected, Sumner’s advocacy should probably be focused on level targeting, as opposed to NGDP targeting. Most important of all is to set a ‘backdated’ level so that we can get back to the trend we were knocked from when this recession started.

I imagine this would involve an immense expansion of the money supply, something an order of magnitude larger than what we’ve already seen.

See his response to my question on his blog:

If the Fed were to do 5% NGDP targeting right now, it wouldn’t help very much. If they did 5% NGDP level targeting from right now, it would help a little more.

If they did 5% NGDP targeting backdated to 2009, we’d get an explosive recovery, actually too fast.

I’d recommend aiming for 6% or 7& for a couple years, then 5% thereafter.

If the Fed did price level targeting from right now it wouldn’t help much. If they backdated it to level targeting from 2008 it would help more, but not as much as NGDP level targeting.

An explicit 2% inflation target (not level targeting) would be the weakest of all, as it’s not much different from what they have been doing.

If they go to level targeting of any sort, futures targeting doesn’t add much.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in economics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s